An article recently posted to the Sacramento Bee prompted a bit of attention on email as well as on the site. I found it interesting to see the criticism regarding a “lunchtime breakaway.” Much of the criticism seemed targeted at the fact that those highlighted in the article were state employees. I ask, are state employees not entitled to taking lunch breaks? I can’t speak for all of the employees mentioned but I know that several, if not all, adjust their workday to accommodate the time taken for this lunch break.
The day the link to the article arrived in my email, I was tethered to my desk at Company G. Once again, I continued working during the lunch hour while outside the sun shone bright. Inside, doom and gloom loomed heavy and moral could not be lower.
It begs the question: Why is this society bent on working 10+ hour days without even taking a break to see the light of day? In my opinion, it’s not healthy. Certainly in my office, there has been a high level of coughing, sneezing, and people calling in sick. And what about productivity? I know that I am far more productive if I can step away for a bit, returning with a fresh perspective and renewed energy. Perhaps, it’s just me.
What are your thoughts?
10+ hour days numbs the mind. Nothing better than taking a short break to rejuvenate it :)
My favorite office was the one in a converted dormitory on campus. We had a track directly behind the back door, and showers upstairs. Yet, I was the only one who took the opportunity to run at lunch. I know I’m guilty of not taking breaks at work, but I certainly not against it, and would not work at a place that discouraged getting away for long. Quality of life issue, as I see it.
Maybe people need to just do it until it becomes a new habit – much like the unhealthy one is currently gaining traction. The work will always be there, right?
i’m not one to ask. my work schedule revolves around my workouts. ;)